![]() He is nothing more than a simple malware spreader, he should apply for a job at SourceForge. After reading his comments on there, there is no remorse for his actions. I don't have time to read updates on products, especially plugins. ![]() No, I didn't read the updates on the product. ![]() I knew the developer wasn't supporting the plugin any more due to funding but I didn't think it would go in that direction, I expected it to just fade away. When I started digging around it was only then I started switching off my plugins 1 by 1 and the eco link went when I switched off the browser resizer, I was honestly shocked. When he replied that he can't see it I started googling the problem, most of the results pertained to Malware and I was shocked, I'm a very careful browser in general. I stupidly assumed it was a new feature Google had rolled out. #Online google webtools resizer how toI immediately emailed one of our SEO guys with a snippet of the page and said, "we need to know how to do this in Google, it must be a new feature". Most of them were big sites, like Amazon and eBay etc. I was browsing the web one Saturday morning and spotted an "Eco link" next to the search results. I certainly hope since then they've changed their policy on this issue and are actively policing and enforcing against spyware and malware.Ĭhrome App extensions can access extremely sensitive data such as webforms with credit card, contact details, passwords and more and in the wrong hands can do untold damage. We believe that ads are a legitimate way to monetize, but that they should be a known cost to the extension user." The policy requires that ads must be presented in the context of the extension or, when present within another page, ads must be outside the page's normal flow and clearly state which extension they are bundled with. "Ad injections are not in violation of the Chrome Web Store program policies. I received an official response that it was within compliance of Chrome App Store policies. What I found troubling was the response back. I run a local user group that educates developers on Google's technologies that while proudly independent from Google, has a great working relationship with their developer relations teams.īack in March of 2012 (that's almost two years ago) I first brought to the attention of the Chrome developer relations team an extension called Bookmark Sentry that essentially contained a trojan that hijacks links to serve up spam ads. ![]() It might even still be there.īe very aware of the permissions an extension asks for. Silent, effective, and this extension was on the 'top lists' for months. Upon further inspection, it turned out it had been re-minified (making diffs difficult) and had a few lines deep inside that hijacked ads and replaced them with the author's ad network. Just last month I came across a game extension (super mario clone) that contained jQuery. It's a wide-open vector for exploitation and it happens all the time. There are a lot of bad extensions out there. It could autoupdate at any time to include malware. This is why you should think - hard - whenever allowing any extension with that permission. Unfortunately this is simply a byproduct of the web's (and browsers') botched security model there is no way to allow extensions to modify pages without them being able to read the pages, and if they can read the pages they naturally can catch events, including keystrokes. You'll see the connections if you inspect the background page directly but most users won't. A chrome extension can make network connections that you won't (normally) see in Dev Tools using a background page. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |